Introduction: Why Workplace Mental Resilience Matters Today
Building Mental Resilience in the Workplace matters in our fast-paced workplace culture. Increasing pressure, change, and uncertainty are causing rising stress and burnout. One third of mental healthcare staff struggle with their well-being at work, and feel that more could be done to provide resources and support that foster resilience and well-being. Poor staff well-being can lead to burnout and compassion fatigue, with serious impacts on patient care and on staff turnover, recruitment, and retention (Gevaux & Petty, 2018). However, the key to resilience is not about avoiding pressure, but adapting to it. This article introduces the concept of mental resilience at work and explains how teams and leaders can learn and incorporate the PERMA model.
What is Workplace Mental Resilience?
Workplace mental resilience is not about being “tough” or unaffected by stress; rather, it is the ability to adapt, recover and maintain functioning under stress. Resilience is a necessary response to adversity to prevent burnout and foster positive adaptation. However, people may react differently to the same life events, with some individuals succumbing to the stress and others overcoming it and responding positively (Gervaux & Petty, 2018). This relates to endurance. Endurance refers to an individual’s stamina and ability to withstand long-term stress, and forming resilient coping strategies does not mean avoiding stress but instead coping with it in ways that promote self-confidence and social competence (Gevaux & Petty, 2018). Coping refers to how the individual manages specific stressors, and connects to learning about their stressors and how to adapt to them.
Why It Matters for Individuals and Organizations
There is growing global interest in boosting healthcare worker wellness, resiliency and self-care (Cohen et al., 2023). In fast-paced workplaces, resilience is integral to better stress management and emotional regulation. Organizations would not have to worry about employee absenteeism,
performance, and engagement, and individuals would experience reduced burnout, improved decision-making under pressure, and greater retention and stronger performance during change and uncertainty.
Workplace Mental Resilience and PERMA Model
The PERMA Model comprises five components that contribute to well-being: positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment. In connection with workplace mental resilience, the PERMA Model helps recovery after stress, supports sustained focus under pressure, strengthens resilience through social support, helps people persist through challenges by reminding them of their purpose, and builds confidence and coping capacity through encouraging progress.
Case Study: Applying the PERMA Model in the Workplace
Healthcare staff at a metropolitan hospital are experiencing burnout due to long shifts, short staffing, emotionally demanding cases, and ongoing pressure to maintain high-quality patient care. As a result, the hospital management noticed an increase in absenteeism, a decline in patient satisfaction scores and communication between departments, and low morale. To address the situation, hospital management decided to implement the PERMA model, a positive psychology framework to improve employees’ well-being and workplace culture.
- Positive Emotion: The nurse manager implemented short end-of-shift debriefs focused on successes or small wins during their shift. This creates an environment of support and acknowledges the hard work of the staff during stressful situations.
- Engagement: The human resource manager provided staff with specialized training programs, including mindfulness, stress and workload management, and interdepartmental communication. This equips staff with additional coping skills during difficult shifts.
- Relationships: To quell the tension between nurses and physicians, the hospital established peer-support partnerships to improve communication and collaboration between the departments, enhancing trust and teamwork and, in turn, the quality of care.
- Meaning: With patients’ consent, hospital management shared anonymous recovery stories or patient messages of appreciation, helping staff feel more connected to the importance and impact of their work.
- Accomplishment: At the end of the year, to boost staff morale, hospital management hosted award events to recognize staff’s hard work.
Signs of Low vs High Workplace Resilience
In learning about Building Mental Resilience in the Workplace, teams and leaders must recognize that resilience can appear low or high among their employees to determine how best to tackle the problem. Low resilience may be exhibited through staff who burn out quickly, avoid challenges, become easily overwhelmed, and appear disengaged from their work. In contrast, high-resilience employees may be distinguished by their adaptability, ability to recover from setbacks, and steady performance under pressure.
Practical Ways to Build Mental Resilience at Work
It is not only important to consider individual differences when learning about what fosters resilience, but also to find common ground on which resources have a positive impact for the majority (Gevaux & Petty, 2018). There are multiple sources and pathways to resilience, including biological, psychological, dispositional, and social support attributes (Hermann et al., 2011).
- Resources – These are organizational structures that can provide coping strategies to foster resilience. These could include personal or organizational-specific resources, such as mental health support or a designated person to refer to for workplace problems.
- Training – Studies show that implementing regular resiliency training in healthcare workplaces has positive effects on stress levels and staff well-being (Gevaux & Petty, 2018). Thus, providing training in emotional regulation and coping skills is essential in building mental resilience at work.
- Support – Strengthening peer support and mentoring systems can create a unified workplace, normalize setbacks as part of learning, and enable self-improvement. ● Creating a safe space – Building psychological safety for sharing challenges can encourage recovery and rest, not constant output.
Role of Leadership and Workplace Culture
Institutions may be reluctant to implement large-scale organizational changes without strong empirical evidence supporting the long-term effectiveness of workplace wellness; however, the recent surge in understanding of workplace wellness and stress further underscores the need to explore and invest in organizational strategies (Cohen et al., 2023). Teams and leaders are
recommended to improve workplace culture and create a venue in which both staff and management can share experiences and offer support to others who may be struggling with their resilience (Gevaux & Petty, 2018). Nevertheless, to do that, the leaders themselves must model healthy coping with stress. Such fostering of workplace mental resilience does not have to be large in scale. It can be something as simple and inexpensive as creating a space for reflection and learning for their employees, avoiding an “always on” culture, and instead supporting flexibility and autonomy.
Common Barriers to Resilience
- Chronic workload pressure – Individuals working in the healthcare industry are consistently faced with high-demand, high-quality workloads, often resulting in a loss of passion and purpose in their work.
- Lack of recovery time – It is common for healthcare professionals to have back-to-back shifts with little to no respite, due to the nature of their work. These can lead to burnout and fatigue, which are integral to absenteeism.
- Poor communication and unclear expectations – Navigating ways of working and adapting to high uncertainty impacts employee well-being (Al-Jubari et al., 2022). Due to the high-stress nature of a healthcare environment, employees may receive conflicting instructions from various professionals, which can lead to tension among colleagues.
- Stigma around asking for help – Some cultures find it difficult and taboo to seek emotional, psychological, and/or professional support. They may find it paradoxical, as healthcare professionals, that it is their job to provide support, not the other way around.
- Reactive rather than supportive management styles – The ability to respond efficiently to uncertainties is an important component for effective workplace performance during times of crisis and career shock. (Al-Jubari et al., 2022). A reactive approach focuses on the problem rather than proactively preventing it. This may lead to blaming the employee rather than offering the support they need to alleviate the situation.
Conclusion: Resilience as a Workplace System, Not Just an Individual Skill
Teams and leaders have influential and integral roles in fostering workplace mental resilience. When the organization invests in actively designing for building mental resilience in the workplace using the PERMA Model, it can positively impact staff performance. Strong workplaces do not strive to eliminate stress; rather, they help people recover from it effectively, because they recognize that resilience is shaped by the environment, not just by the individual mindset.
References
- Al-Jubari, I., Mosbah, A., & Salem, S. F. (2022). Employee Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Adaptability, Work-Family Conflict, and Organizational Response. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221096142
- Cohen, C., Pignata, S., Bezak, E., Tie, M., & Childs, J. (2023). Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians, and allied healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMJ open, 13(6), e071203. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071203
- Gevaux, N. S., & Petty, S. (2018). Maximising resilience resources for mental healthcare staff. The Mental Health Review., 23(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-10-2016-0020
- Herrman, H., Stewart, D. E., Diaz-Granados, N., Berger, E. L., Jackson, B., & Yuen, T. (2011). What is Resilience? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 56(5), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371105600504